If. . .
February 10th, 2005 | by Craig |. . . there’s a subject more exciting than job order costing, I can’t imagine what it would be.
Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.
Mini-Me
Recent Comments
- Gman:It's pretty entertaining seein
- Jimmy don\'t play that:Howls of derisive laughter, Br
- DMerriman:It's all male bovine effluent.
- Steve:Creativity will always find a
- dogette:I still love my "FUHRC" shirt.
- Jim - PRS:Reminds me of my "FBO" tee shi
- David Crisp:The "Chosen One"? You are a sm
- Craig:Mark, do you lack the capacity
- Mark T:generally when I come here, wh
- Craig:You and I are actually in agre
Liberty's Asylum
Recent Post
- In These Troubled Times, We Need The Wisdom of Wilford Brimley
- Trouble In The Promised Land?
- A Taste of What Browns Fans are In For Today
- The Latest from Ric Romero
- Who Am I?
- Montana Election Wiki
- As Mel Brooks Observed
- Words Fail Me
- Right Montana
- Montana’s Progressive Candidate Says He Can Beat Baucus
3 Responses to “If. . .”
By Pandora on Feb 11, 2005 | Reply
More excitement ahead…next comes the “high/low” method and the “least-squares regression” method of separating mixed costs into fixed and variable. Wheeee!
By Craig on Feb 11, 2005 | Reply
Be still my heart!!
By R. Alex on Feb 12, 2005 | Reply
One of the best aspects of a job in my somewhat varied and young career has been cost analysis (efficiency reports, profit margins, etc.). Whether that says more about how I feel about cost analysis or how pathetic my career has been is up for you to judge.