Oh Noes!! More Out Of State Muneez!!11one!!

May 19th, 2008, by Craig

I know it’s like a.) beating a dead horse or b.) pointing out the obvious, but for all the caterwauling and bitching about out of state money, the sinestra is strangely silent when the out of state money comes from their fellow travelers.

A quick perusal of the SEIU’s records from the Department of Labor indicate that there’s really not that much money for the locals to be spending on election issues, so that money has to be coming from somewhere.

Whaddaya say, fellas? Why is this out-of-state money good, and other is bad?

Small Town, Long Streets

May 14th, 2008, by Craig

Join us tonight for another edition of “Small Town, Long Streets”, the sort-of weekly podcast/call-in show from mtpolitics.net. The fun begins at 9:00 p.m. MDT.

Tonight will be, for all intents and purposes, Part 1 of a two-week show where we’ll be talking about what’s going on in the arena of climate change in Montana. (Next week, Paul Chesser of Climate Strategies Watch will be on.) Depending on how things go, we may also talk about Montana’s gubernatorial race, education funding, and if you decide to call in, whatever is on your mind. We love to have you on.

Phone: (718) 664-9769
E-Mail: podcast@mtpolitics.net
Yahoo! IM: mtppodcast

Listen to Small Town, Long Streets on internet talk radio

Hey, How She Go?

May 12th, 2008, by Craig

I’ve got a couple of things in the pipeline, but not enough oomph to finish them up tonight.

How was your weekend? Good Mother’s Day?

From The “I Wish I’da Written That” Files

May 7th, 2008, by Craig

Do yourself a favor, and read this from the state’s best concrete blogger.

Well said, sir. Well said.

Podcast Cancelled Tonight

May 7th, 2008, by Craig

Sorry for the short notice, but there will be no podcast/BTR show tonight.

Thanks!

Oh! I Think I Know The Answer To This One!

May 7th, 2008, by Craig

A 20-year-old Belgrade man has been charged with felony criminal endangerment for accidentally shooting his friend in the chest after asking, “Do you trust me?”

How about no, you crazy Dutch bastard?

Exhibit 32

May 5th, 2008, by Craig

James has a great post over at 2nd Grade Bike Rack (you should ask him the story behind that name one of these days) talking about “Exhibit 32″ from the last Environmental Quality Council. He wasn’t able to post it at Blogspot, but he was kind enough to send it to me, and you can read it here.

It does an actual (gasp!) cost-benefit analysis, and concludes that Montana could lose up to 16,600 jobs if the measures are implemented.

Short version: Your legislature may be preparing to sacrifice 16,600 jobs upon the altar of bad science and bad policy.

Pennsylvania Advocacy Groups, Working for Montanans!

RSVP

May 5th, 2008, by Craig

Right, left, center, up or down, there’s one thing we all (should) agree on, and strive toward, and that is honesty and transparency in our government, whether it be at the city level, the county level, the state level, or even the national level.

One of the things that makes Montana great is that this notion is enshrined in our state constitution as a right.

No person shall be deprived of the right to examine documents or to observe the deliberations of all public bodies or agencies of state government and its subdivisions, except in cases in which the demand of individual privacy clearly exceeds the merits of public disclosure.

Often times, we as citizens and/or bloggers are not exactly clear how our rights are exercised, and how to go about asking for documents. For example, we may not know which statute to cite, or even what to look for, or what our options are when stonewalled.

To that end, Gregg Smith of Electric City Weblog, who is an attorney and has some familiarity with the process and procedure of FOIA requests, has offered to put together a presentation on how to do a FOIA request, and some of the procedural issues around it.

Gregg, being the generous individual he is, is offering to do this on his own time, so we want to see if there’s an interest out there — from both sides of the aisle — to make it worthwhile to put the effort together.

You can drop a comment here, send me an email, or head over to Gregg’s site and drop him a note there. Let us know as quick as you can, so that if there’s enough interest, we can get moving on it. And when I say “we,” I mean Gregg.

For Me, But Not For Thee

May 2nd, 2008, by Craig

OH NOES! Here comes the Out Of State Moneez! EVERYBODY PANIC!!!11ONE!Eleventy!!

Just so I have the whole thing straight: It’s evidently OK for out of state interests to dictate policy to the executive and to the lege — without debate, without transparency — as long as the legislation is favorable to the sinestra.

But, if someone introduces initiatives that people can actually read, think about, then decide for themselves whether or not it’s appropriate, then it’s a Bad Thing™.

What am I missing?

[UPDATE]:  It’s like these posts write themselves.

A Bit Too Much

April 30th, 2008, by Craig

The Montana Meth Project ads have had a big impact here in MT, and by all accounts, they are working. I know my own kids are quite disturbed by the seemingly ubiquitous billboards.

I have to agree, though, that their latest effort has gone a tad too far.

The billboard shows the head and shoulders of a strung-out teenage girl lying on her stomach, staring into the distance. On top of her lies a man who is clutching her shoulder. Most of the man’s face and body is cropped out of the photo. Accompanying the photo is the slogan: “15 bucks for sex isn’t normal. But on meth it is.”

The ad suggests the two are engaged in sex for money, potentially to buy more meth.

That last sentence cracked me up. It seems so bland, like saying, “pornographic movies suggest that people are engaged in sexual intercourse.”

Still and all, it’s a bit much for billboards, if you ask me.

Small Town, Long Streets

April 30th, 2008, by Craig

Tonight on Small Town, Long Streets, my guest is Mario Burgos, a blogger from New Mexico.

We’ll be talking about the “purpling” of the Mountain West, among other things.

Mario is an interesting guy, and has some good stories to tell, so it’ll be worth your time to join in.

Phone: (718) 664-9769
Email: podcast@mtpolitics.net
Yahoo! IM: mtppodcast

Listen to Small Town, Long Streets on internet talk radio

The Skeptics Society Looks at AGW

April 27th, 2008, by Craig

You should really give the whole thing a read, but if you don’t have time, here’s the important part:

So the bottom line is this: When it comes to future climate, no one knows what they’re talking about. No one. Not the IPCC nor its scientists, not the US National Academy of Sciences, not the NRDC or National Geographic, not the US Congressional House leadership, not me, not you, and certainly not Mr. Albert Gore. Earth’s climate is warming and no one knows exactly why. But there is no falsifiable scientific basis whatever to assert this warming is caused by human-produced greenhouse gasses because current physical theory is too grossly inadequate to establish any cause at all. [Emphasis mine. –Ed.]

The Law, Censorship and Anonymity Podcast

April 27th, 2008, by Craig

If you caught the recent edition of Small Town, Long Streets,” you got to listen to Gregg Smith and Jeff Mangan talk about, among other things, openness in government. If you enjoyed their conversation, you also know that they have been doing their own podcasts. Their latest edition talks about legal issues with blogs, censorship and anonymity.

For some reason, I found this podcast rather timely, not to mention very well done. Go on over and give it a listen.

The Blogger Protection Act of 2008

April 25th, 2008, by Congressman Denny Rehberg

A 2007 report (pdf) found that, in 2006, almost one out of three Americans – more than 60 million people – used the Internet to get political news and information and to discuss campaign races. Over half of Internet users say that they use it because of the amount of information and perspectives that are available – something not easily or cheaply available through more traditional forms of media.

One of the primary sources of participation in 2006 was ‘blogs’. It seems there is a blog for just about everything, and not surprisingly, many of them discuss politics. For that reason, young voters are participating in the process more than ever before.

In Montana, we have blogs of every flavor. Some are supportive of conservative ideals, while others are critical. Some write about local issues and some focus on federal matters. Some focus on policy while others concentrate on politics. Whether I agree with them or not, it’s always important to remember that these blogs are written by everyday Montanans. They are the Voice of the People. It’s important we protect that freedom.

One way I’m doing this is by supporting H.R. 5699, the Blogger Protection Act of 2008, a bill which would protect Montana’s bloggers from the unnecessary intrusion of Washington, DC bureaucrats.

In 2002, Congress passed Campaign Finance Reform which some opponents feared would curb free speech. While the bill didn’t specifically mention regulation of the Internet, the law of unintended consequences resulted in a 2004 Federal Court ruling (pdf) which ordered the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to begin regulating speech on the Internet. The Internet, they argued, like newspapers or magazines, could provide “in-kind” support to a candidate by hyperlinking to their website or suggesting that people donate to them. As a result, bloggers faced a threat of FEC investigations which would have resulted in a public disclosure requirement and expensive litigation, providing hindrance to the work you all do.

Thankfully, in 2006, at the urgent request of Congress, the FEC passed a rule (pdf) exempting blogs and their authors from this destructive intrusion of federal authority. We argued the Internet is unique because the consumer, not the producer, decides what’s worth reading. Unlike traditional media, speech on the internet is not constrained by scarcity of space and production. Internet content is only as effective as the choices of the audience to view it.

Exempting Internet speech from FEC regulation was right thing to do, but the fight isn’t over. As easily as this rule was created in 2006, it can be removed by a new Administration. That’s why the Blogger Protection Act is necessary. It’s critical my House colleagues and I move quickly in making this protection permanent.

I’d like to thank Craig Sprout, author of Montana Politics, for giving me the opportunity to explain why this bill is important. Montana Politics is one of the most seasoned Montana blogs so it’s an appropriate forum. Of course, there are many other great Montana blogs and I’m proud to stand up for their right to say what they think even while I don’t always agree with what they say.

Montana Climate Change Action Plan is Bad Policy…

April 24th, 2008, by Craig

…based on bad science. But we’ve covered that already. Here is a peer-reviewed study from the Montana Policy Institute that comes to the same conclusion. You can read the entire report here. (And gird yourselves for some wailing and gnashing!)

Bozeman, MT. April 23rd, 2008: The Montana Policy Institute, a new nonpartisan policy research organization in Montana, has just released a study by the Beacon Hill Institute challenging the economic assumptions and methodology employed by Montana’s Climate Change Advisory Group’s recently released Montana Climate Change Action Plan (MCCAP). The study does not address the science of climate change or attempt to assign motives to the Advisory Group’s recommendations. It simply examines the economics of the MCCAP plan and the methodology employed to assess the plan’s costs and benefits.

The study concludes that:

  • MCCAP costs and benefits are not quantified in a way that allows them to be compared. Estimated costs to reduce greenhouse gases of between $93 million to $691 million are set against metric tons of greenhouse gases reduced, without any attempt to weigh the benefits of reducing those gases against the costs of reducing them;
  • When estimating economic impacts, costs are sometimes misinterpreted as benefits;
  • Cost estimates leave out important factors, including program expenses, alternative scenarios, demand-based consumer responses, and other factors, resulting in unrealistically low best-case figures.

These shortcomings disqualify the MCCAP as a scientifically sound basis for public policy. The Montana Policy Institute believes that a comprehensive cost/benefit analysis using realistic assumptions and sound economic principles should be conducted before Montana policymakers decide to create new mandates, new bureaucracies, and new open-ended spending commitments. The stakes are too high on both sides of the climate change issue to accept anything less than a full and honest debate.